The Skepbitch

Scathing Skepticism and Social Commentary

Subjectivity, Semantics and Shoes…

RSL logoFor those of you unacquainted with Australian society, it is essentially a pub culture.

Of course, America has its pubs, bars, drinking houses and “dinner and dancing establishments” if you’re in Salt Lake.

But Australia is replete with what are called “clubs”.  Most of them are Returned Services League (RSL) clubs – these are clubs that commemorate military veterans.

RSL Clubs are a curious blend of bar, casino, cafe, restaurant and theater; where you can grab a beer, a coffee, or a meal, play the slots (pokies as they’re known) and watch a psychic medium do bad cold readings, or a washed-up 80s band like The Radiators singing their one-hit wonder “You give me head” even though they’re well into their 50s…

…that is, you can do all of this as long as you’re not wearing a hat…

Club Dress RulesYou see, RSL Clubs have a conservative dress code. Despite Australians’ fondness for casual dress, Australia is also fond of its bureaucracy, and its dress codes; school kids wear uniforms, staff wear uniforms, and to get into most clubs you must resist the urge to wear daring apparel such as shorts, baseball caps, ankle socks and overalls. If you disobey the rules (and didn’t even know the rules) you will be refused entry…

Your clothing must be neat, clean and unrevealing. Mens’ shirts must be collared.

Once my brother tried to enter the Manly Leagues Club wearing a polo-neck shirt.

“It doesn’t have a collar,” the bouncer pronounced.

“But it does have a collar,” my brother argued. “In fact, it has an extra-long collar,” he said as he extended the rolled collar and tugged on it to show its length.

The bargaining was to no avail, and he was refused entry into the club.

And then it happened to me on Friday night…

I went to Dee Why RSL Club to meet up with my mates Duffy, Billy and Phil. I was greeted at the entrance by a doorman who asked for a membership card or ID. I compliantly showed my driver’s license, and everything seemed fine, until he suddenly looked down and announced:

“I’m sorry, I can’t let you in… You’re wearing thongs.”

(Come now, Yanks… you know by now that thongs are flip-flops and g-strings are thongs. Okay, I was wearing a thong too, but most of you know that also…)

The doorman saw my confused look, grabbed a card of guidelines and pointed to a rule that read:

No thongs after 8 PM

“Oh, come on!” I scoffed, searching for counter-arguments. “I’m not barefoot. The thongs are clean. In fact, they’re expensive thongs, not cheap, tatty ones.”

“Sorry, that’s the rule,” he shrugged. “You can go home and change your shoes if you like.”

“Is there a manager around who could reconsider your decision?” I appealed.

Footy scrumBy now, a few other doormen had also appeared, all curious as to what was going down. A manager was phoned, and he soon arrived. Then they all just stood there, when somewhere else in the club someone was probably slipping date-rape drugs into some chick’s drink, or a few yobbos were starting a fight at the bar.

I counted a total of six tall, burly, beefy Aussie blokes encircled around me. I felt like I was the football in the middle of a football scrum, except these guys were staring at my fucking shoes. I looked down at my offending feet, wiggling my red-painted toenails uncomfortably as these meat-heads decided the fate of my evening.

As if on cue, another female guest arrives, shows her membership card and saunters on in – wearing thongs!

“Hang on a second, there’s an inconsistency” I twigged, suddenly filled with ammunition. “She’s wearing thongs, but you allowed her in. Is that because she’s a member, and I’m not?’

“No,” said one of the muscular yet simple oafs, “she’s wearing dress thongs… but your wearing beach thongs.”

(He was so dumb I just knew that he’d left out the apostrophe in “you’re”, even when he spoke…)

…pause…

“Who are you? The fashion police? That is subjective!” I snapped at them.

“Are you authorities on thongs? How do you differentiate between dress thongs and beach thongs?” I demanded as they all stood there, blinking stupidly at me. I pointed to their club rules and raised my voice, “Do the rules state acceptable materials or colors or designs that constitute some sort of thong taxonomy?”

There was a stunned silence, until one of them asked with wide eyes, “Are you an English teacher?”

“No,” I corrected him.  “I’m a semanticist and I once defined the word walk,” I said firmly, realising how fucking peculiar that sounded.

I continued. “My point is, if you can’t clearly define the different types of thongs then you’re discriminating against my shoes!”

The manager’s eyes flashed at the insinuation of discrimination.

“You can come in, Miss,” he said politely, waving me in to the club grandly. And so I walked in, wearing my “beach thongs”…

March 15, 2009 - Posted by skepbitch | Skepticism | , , , , | 19 Comments

19 Comments »

  1. We are an odd country. In “the Valley” in Brisbane, you don’t get into places if you don’t have the right look. A polo shirt is a no-no and wouldn’t be allowed, but a deliberately ripped army jackets and scuffed up shoes will do the trick.

    We also lambaste a cricketer for going fishing instead of turning up to a team meeting, dropping him from the national side and make him see a psychologist, but give raping footballers a month ban at most…

    Comment by Theo | March 15, 2009 | Reply

  2. Dang, the manager caved. Thongs are a horrible piece of footwear, worse than ugg boots. They’re what you wear when you would normally go barefoot but there’s a risk of burning or otherwise injuring yourself. The other person should have been rounded up and put to the same fate.

    Comment by BastardSheep | March 15, 2009 | Reply

  3. Ha ha ha! Karen, I think I officially love you. You got in because you argued the language? You are Wonder Woman. In thongs!

    Dr Rachie xx

    Comment by scepdoll | March 16, 2009 | Reply

  4. Damn, you rock. What daft rules. Basic ‘tidy’ is what should be expected – the minutia is just pathetic. Especially if they allow someone else with a member card to flaunt the rule in front of them!

    Comment by Podblack | March 16, 2009 | Reply

  5. I have always been surprised that no clever cartoonist has drawn the crossover garment–footwear that covers the situation. I guess they may have drawn it and decided it was not really funny.

    Your story reminds me of one about someone arguing the toss with a Spanish traffic cop who was insisting that it was illegal to cross a double line when you have strayed onto the wrong side of it. In those days I spoke much better Spanish than I do now, and he was amazed when I won the argument and he asked to see my id and all I had was a passport.

    Only difference was that you were speaking English to the RSL cop. Oh, hang on, he may have thought that was a different language …

    Comment by Iain | March 16, 2009 | Reply

  6. Arguing with a bouncer over semantics? Wow, you got some stones!

    Comment by Ben | March 16, 2009 | Reply

  7. I should point out that my prior comment wasn’t intended to be having a go at you, it’s just that the topic set of an irrational pet peeve of mine against thongs and I couldn’t hold back.

    Comment by BastardSheep | March 17, 2009 | Reply

  8. Wow. Bouncers that can speak. Must’ve been a classy place.

    Comment by anaglyph | March 17, 2009 | Reply

  9. No one messes with my Kazza, you could (and did) run circles around them without even the slightest pause in conversation. There’s a reason (actually many many many reasons) why you are brilliant, and that is one of them. *hug* xxx~ your tt

    Comment by Mr. BlueBubbles | March 18, 2009 | Reply

  10. He was so dumb I just knew that he’d left out the apostrophe in “you’re”, even when he spoke…

    I think I just found my favourite sentence so far this year. Thanks.

    Comment by AndyD | March 18, 2009 | Reply

  11. When I argue with bouncers they punch me repeatedly. Sexism in action, I think. :)

    Comment by truthwalker | March 25, 2009 | Reply

  12. Personally I’m not that keen on the “Australia is a pub culture” stereotype. Historically, maybe, but if I had to guess what percentage of Australian adults go to the pub more than once a month, I’d say maybe 10% or so. As for RSL halls, those are pretty much a foreign country to me. I might have been inside one or two when they happen to have hosted some special community event, but I’m honestly surprised to hear you talk about going to one just for a casual catch-up with friends. Then again, you have returned, and much of what you do is of service to humanity, so some of us might well consider you a returned service.

    Comment by Flesh-eating Dragon | March 27, 2009 | Reply

  13. Sorry to have to advance this, but my understanding of the “no thongs” rule is that it was( this was around 1975)put in place to keep the “boongs” out, at least that’s what I was told whilst on holiday in Western Australia.
    My small family was travelling ’round Oz in a Fiat 850, and because of space restrictions we’d only brought informal footwear. At the beginning we would ask if they minded that we only had thongs on our feet, and invariably they would say “nah, thats o.k.”,until eventually someone told me the ,unimagined until then , reason.
    I can’t remember now ,but maybe it happened while my wife wasn’t with me. She is half aboriginal but because of her Gulf Country ancestry (possible Malay/Mallacan)looks Mauri or Middle Eastern).

    Comment by charles davies | March 27, 2009 | Reply

  14. A “thong” would have very different connotations in other parts of the world. Kind of like the term “pants” in the UK, which we in N. America take to mean “trousers”.

    Comment by The Necromancer | March 28, 2009 | Reply

  15. I love this story so much!

    Comment by The Perky Skeptic | April 14, 2009 | Reply

  16. Hmmm, I wasnt aware that doctors went into pubs…

    Comment by Alex | April 24, 2009 | Reply

  17. “(He was so dumb I just knew that he’d left out the apostrophe in “you’re”, even when he spoke…)”

    Gold.

    Comment by Chad Eisner | May 15, 2009 | Reply

  18. Apostrophes are overrated semi-colloquialisms and should be eliminated from the English Language.

    Comment by Alex | May 16, 2009 | Reply

  19. Why are people so uptight about thong wearing? Here’s an interesting article by a journalist named Mary Spicuzza in America (“Panty Ranting”) that explains how some school girls took on the establishment vis a vis thong wearing:

    http://www.metroactive.com/papers/metro/12.14.00/dresscode-0050.html

    Comment by Rafaella | August 25, 2009 | Reply


Leave a comment