<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skepticism: Going out of business?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/the-editorial-that-never-was/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/the-editorial-that-never-was/</link>
	<description>Scathing Skepticism and Social Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 00:18:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/the-editorial-that-never-was/#comment-1992</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-1992</guid>
		<description>Sad to see you leave Karen. Although being a subscriber of the Skeptic for longer than I can even remember it seems a bit strange that your departure is shrouded in mystery. It seems to go totally against the grain of what we&#039;re all about. Being open and honest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad to see you leave Karen. Although being a subscriber of the Skeptic for longer than I can even remember it seems a bit strange that your departure is shrouded in mystery. It seems to go totally against the grain of what we&#8217;re all about. Being open and honest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/the-editorial-that-never-was/#comment-1855</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 07:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-1855</guid>
		<description>Sure, skepticism has a lot of work to do, but I like to reassure myself by looking at long term trends. 

Since we are celebrating Darwin&#039;s life this year, it is worthwhile to think about society and beliefs in say Australia or NZ 150 years ago. You might complain about Creationism now, but draw a line from 150 years ago when Evolution was just an idea without a good mechanism.

There has also been rather a lot of success in science, medicine and knowledge, which appears to be increasing despite the odd setback. Not so much progress in fields of &#039;research&#039; like homeopathy, or phrenology the last 200yrs, even if they are still around to some degree or another. Even organized mass religions seem to be losing their grip; look at the trend in church attendance, and the fragmentation into sects (nicely illustrated in Life of Brian). Countries ruled by theocracies don&#039;t seem to do so well as liberal democracies that invest in education; this will become more apparent in a post-oil economy. 

For every set back like the recent vocal anti-vaccine crowd, there have been huge successes like the wins against small-pox and polio.     

My kids grow up with vast amounts of information some good, some bad; but having starting points like Wikipedia available at their finger-tips, will make a difference. Instead of just believing anything we are told, it can take seconds to get an answer to any question that has been answered.

Call me an optimist, but &#039;the truth&#039; will win out; it will just take a very long time, and require that we all contribute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, skepticism has a lot of work to do, but I like to reassure myself by looking at long term trends. </p>
<p>Since we are celebrating Darwin&#8217;s life this year, it is worthwhile to think about society and beliefs in say Australia or NZ 150 years ago. You might complain about Creationism now, but draw a line from 150 years ago when Evolution was just an idea without a good mechanism.</p>
<p>There has also been rather a lot of success in science, medicine and knowledge, which appears to be increasing despite the odd setback. Not so much progress in fields of &#8216;research&#8217; like homeopathy, or phrenology the last 200yrs, even if they are still around to some degree or another. Even organized mass religions seem to be losing their grip; look at the trend in church attendance, and the fragmentation into sects (nicely illustrated in Life of Brian). Countries ruled by theocracies don&#8217;t seem to do so well as liberal democracies that invest in education; this will become more apparent in a post-oil economy. </p>
<p>For every set back like the recent vocal anti-vaccine crowd, there have been huge successes like the wins against small-pox and polio.     </p>
<p>My kids grow up with vast amounts of information some good, some bad; but having starting points like Wikipedia available at their finger-tips, will make a difference. Instead of just believing anything we are told, it can take seconds to get an answer to any question that has been answered.</p>
<p>Call me an optimist, but &#8216;the truth&#8217; will win out; it will just take a very long time, and require that we all contribute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sycologist</title>
		<link>http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/the-editorial-that-never-was/#comment-581</link>
		<dc:creator>sycologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 01:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-581</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry: We have the US and Saudi Arabia. Skepticism still has a long way to run.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry: We have the US and Saudi Arabia. Skepticism still has a long way to run.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MadScientist</title>
		<link>http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/the-editorial-that-never-was/#comment-577</link>
		<dc:creator>MadScientist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 11:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-577</guid>
		<description>Well put.  I vote that skeptics will not be out of business while humans exist and religions do not have control of governments. Who knows what to expect on a timescale of thousands of years, but in the short term if we look at texts (or translations) surviving from the past 2000 years, there have always been skeptics and a disproportionate credulous population.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well put.  I vote that skeptics will not be out of business while humans exist and religions do not have control of governments. Who knows what to expect on a timescale of thousands of years, but in the short term if we look at texts (or translations) surviving from the past 2000 years, there have always been skeptics and a disproportionate credulous population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bunc</title>
		<link>http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/the-editorial-that-never-was/#comment-570</link>
		<dc:creator>Bunc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-570</guid>
		<description>I remain completely sceptical about scepticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remain completely sceptical about scepticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr Embiggen</title>
		<link>http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/the-editorial-that-never-was/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr Embiggen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 07:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Nooooooooooooooo! You can&#039;t leave! Noooooooooooo! I would have taken a bullet for you. You know that right? Long live the Queen! The Queen is dead! Long live the Queen! Oh yes and great article. May the Force be with you ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nooooooooooooooo! You can&#8217;t leave! Noooooooooooo! I would have taken a bullet for you. You know that right? Long live the Queen! The Queen is dead! Long live the Queen! Oh yes and great article. May the Force be with you <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: White Rabbit</title>
		<link>http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/the-editorial-that-never-was/#comment-567</link>
		<dc:creator>White Rabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 12:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-567</guid>
		<description>Blast, we just managed to score a wickedly cool editor and then we lost her...they better be paying you well.

Totally agree with the article. I wish we could go out of business too but sadly we are dealing with humans here. 

Oooh point in case, my Aunt recently blasted me for being closed minded regarding the &quot;blood type diet&quot;. My point was that it was pseudoscience...she doesn&#039;t trust science, too closed minded.

sigh...

we&#039;ll miss you.

^_^
W R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blast, we just managed to score a wickedly cool editor and then we lost her&#8230;they better be paying you well.</p>
<p>Totally agree with the article. I wish we could go out of business too but sadly we are dealing with humans here. </p>
<p>Oooh point in case, my Aunt recently blasted me for being closed minded regarding the &#8220;blood type diet&#8221;. My point was that it was pseudoscience&#8230;she doesn&#8217;t trust science, too closed minded.</p>
<p>sigh&#8230;</p>
<p>we&#8217;ll miss you.</p>
<p>^_^<br />
W R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seantheblogonaut</title>
		<link>http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/the-editorial-that-never-was/#comment-566</link>
		<dc:creator>seantheblogonaut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 04:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-566</guid>
		<description>Nice editorial.  You have me suitably intrigued about your departure from Australian Skeptics :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice editorial.  You have me suitably intrigued about your departure from Australian Skeptics :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anaglyph</title>
		<link>http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/the-editorial-that-never-was/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>anaglyph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 23:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-565</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sad to hear you&#039;ve departed Australian Skeptics, especially when I read an editorial like that. I guess our loss is someone else&#039;s gain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sad to hear you&#8217;ve departed Australian Skeptics, especially when I read an editorial like that. I guess our loss is someone else&#8217;s gain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Wagg</title>
		<link>http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/2009/04/30/the-editorial-that-never-was/#comment-564</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Wagg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 22:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skepbitch.wordpress.com/?p=460#comment-564</guid>
		<description>Skepticism can&#039;t really go out of business. It&#039;s really just science, and we&#039;re always going to need that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skepticism can&#8217;t really go out of business. It&#8217;s really just science, and we&#8217;re always going to need that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
